|
IV. |
Current Operations: |
|
a) |
1) |
Final summary: Convoy No. 28: |
|
|
|
The England bound convoy, HX 234, was pursued from the morning of the 21st to the morning of the 25th over a distance of 700 seamiles by altogether 19 boats. 4 boats broke off operations on the second day, so that when the convoy was intercepted with certainty and continuous contact messages were being received, 15 boats were engaged. |
|
|
|
It was U 306, who from the beginning of the operation reported the convoy with persistence and efficiency worthy of recognition, and who every time, also found it again after temporary loss. |
|
|
|
It was not until 2 days after the beginning of the operation on the morning of the 23rd, that more boats came up to the convoy and this was made possible , as is obvious from the position reports, by the boats good fixes. This meant that during the day and the following night, altogether 12 boats came up to the convoy. Although the boats had about 7 hours of darkness, 2 hours without moonlight, there was nothing achieved. U 306, requested to give a situation report on the following day, reported that during the night when numerous boats were in position, there was very unfavorable weather, hail, fog, rain, snow squalls with variable visibility. The convoy exploited this very cleverly for his zig zags. The enemy sailed in line ahead with about 10 ships, and destroyers or escort vessels were disposed in the gaps. |
|
|
|
The main reason for the failure can be attributed to the extremely changeable visibility experienced during the night. The Commanders, for the most part inexperienced and fresh from home waters, were unable to cope with these conditions. |
|
|
|
Air activity was so intense on the following day, the 24th that all boats were beaten off and the convoy lost. On the following morning, the 25th, operations were broken off. |
|
|
|
Altogether 2 ships of 19,500 GRT were sunk and 2 ships torpedoed. |
|
|
|
The slight success achieved, in an operation lasting four days and with a fairly large numbers of boats, may be explained as follows: The conditions of convoy warfare are becoming increasingly difficult, above all the case of convoys in the N., where the nights are especially short, and the enemy is able to provide protection with strong air forces from Greenland, and to an even greater extent from Iceland. Boats usually choose a night when a large number of boats are in contact with the convoy, and the not disproportionately strong defence makes success appear likely. The night of 23/24 in this case. Before this, only one boat was in contact and afterwards the air protection was too strong. This night was the only chance. It could not be exploited owing to the very unfavorable weather conditions in conjunction with the inexperience of the large number of new Commanders who were not equal to the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|