EASTERN SEA FRONTIER  | 
      WAR DIARY  | 
      APRIL 1942  | 
      ||
CHAPTER III  | 
      ||||
THE CONVOY SYSTEM  | 
      ||||
        Throughout 
          April preparations for the coastal convoy system were carried forward 
          by Commander Eastern Sea Frontier in accordance with the directive issued 
          on the 3rd of the month by the Commander-in-Chief. Escort groups were 
          organized, schedules drawn up and the machinery of administration constructed. 
          But all these preparations were simply the preliminaries for a means 
          of protection which could not possibly, because of the limited number 
          of forces available, be introduced before the middle of May. It was, 
          therefore, necessary, in view of the continued high rate of sinkings, 
          to provide immediate defense against the submarines by supplementary 
          methods.   | 
      ||||
| The most dangerous area during this month as in the past, remains in the waters around Hatteras. Here the narrowness of the continental shelf enables the U-boats to operate in deep water close inshore with great effectiveness and comparative impunity. Steps to curtail the success of their operations had been taken in March when CESF sent out a directive requesting merchant vessels to proceed from Cape Lookout to the Chesapeake in daylight. At night these ships lay in protected anchorages that had been established at each of the terminal ports. | ||||
| On the 14th of this month CESF proposed further action to increase the protection of ships sailing through this dangerous area. In a letter to the Commandant of the Fifth Naval District, he suggested that all those | ||||
- 1 -  | 
      ||||
ships now sailing independently between Lookout and 
          the Chesapeake should be formed into convoys. The proposed system would 
          work as follows: merchant vessels would put into Lookout at night. Ordinarily 
          between twelve and twenty vessels would seek refuge in the anchorage 
          which, pending the laying of a proposed mine field, is now guarded by 
          ships equipped with listening gear, depth charges and guns.  | 
      ||
        In 
          the early morning the merchantmen would form up together, four ships 
          to a column. Convoy doctrine requires that there should be 600 yards 
          between ships and 1000 yards between columns. Those vessels unable to 
          maintain nine knots or capable of more than thirteen would sail independently. 
          Escort would be provided by one slow ship that would lead the convoy 
          and by three fast ones that would patrol to seaward and in rear of the 
          convoy. Whenever a destroyer was available it would be added to the 
          escort force.  | 
      ||
| Forty smaller craft including twenty 83' Coast Guard Cutters attached to the Fifth Naval District would form the pool from which the escorting force would be taken. Commander, Eastern Sea Frontier realized, "that the foregoing plan utilizes practically all available patrol vessels of the Fifth Naval District." But, "at the same time by concentrating our shipping and patrol vessels as escorts the best possible protection will be gained." | ||
| A week later on April 22nd the Commandant of the Fifth Naval District replied that the proposed system was "practically in effect now," since all northbound ships were escorted from Lookout and all southbound traffic was provided with air coverage. It was, however, impossible to | ||
- 2 -  | 
      ||
introduce the convoy system as proposed by CESF because 
          neither ships nor men were available in sufficient number to implement 
          the plan.  | 
      |||||||||||
        It 
          was necessary for CESF in this month to improvise methods for the protection 
          of shipping in the northern as well as the southern extremity of the 
          Frontier. On April 23rd he drew up plans for a coastal convoy from Boston 
          to Halifax and Sydney. Such a convoy provided many complications since 
          it served as the middle link in a chain of shipping extending from our 
          southern coastal waters to the open seas of the North Atlantic. In addition, 
          at the northern end control would have to pass from our hands into those 
          of the British. It was, therefore, necessary to devise some system that 
          would integrate the activities of two different navys and fit together 
          the sailing schedules of our coastal convoys with those of the North 
          Atlantic.   | 
      |||||||||||
| It was ultimately planned by CESF that the Commandant of the First Naval District would "issue the necessary orders and routing instructions to the Boston-Halifax convoys and escort under directives issued by CESF" but such a procedure required the services of personnel and facilities which were not in April available. It was, therefore, directed that temporarily the Port Director in New York would: | |||||||||||
|   
  | 
      |||||||||||
  | 
      |||||||||||
- 3 -  | 
      |||||||||||
  | 
      |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        The 
          Commandant, First Naval District, or his designated representative, 
          will:   | 
      |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|   
  | 
      |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  | 
      |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The intricacies of a system devised to protect shipping from our southern coastal waters all the way to our northern boundaries are revealed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 4 -  | 
      |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|   in a consideration of the two convoy systems described above. Perhaps a clearer impression can be gained by following the fortunes of a single vessel from the Gulf of Mexico to Halifax. No ship, in all probability, would proceed in exactly the fashion described below, but such a voyage is at least possible and indicates the variety of methods of protection that have been devised. A tanker from the Gulf would receive her routing instructions from the Port Director at the port of departure. She would sail through the Florida Straits and thence up the coast, passing as close inshore as safe navigation permitted. By day she would follow shipping lanes patrolled by land based aircraft and by surface vessels; by night she would lie over in patrolled or protected anchorages. Her first stop for the night might well be Charleston whence she would proceed to Cape Lookout. Thus far she would have traveled independently, but at Lookout she would join the convoy that would protect her on the trip to the Chesapeake. From the Chesapeake she would make a daylight run to the Delaware. From here, if of limited draft, she might take advantage of the inland waterway to New York but a larger vessel would in all probability join another convoy from Delaware to New York.  | 
      ||
At New York the ship would probably lie over for a day or two while vessels for the northern convoy assembled. On the evening of departure there would be a pre-sailing conference between the various masters before their ships set off independently next day through the Sound, Buzzards Bay and the Cape Cod Canal for the rendezvous in Cape Cod Bay. Here they would form up in convoy under British escort and proceed to Halifax under British  | 
      ||
- 5 -  | 
      ||
|   and American air coverage. From Halifax the ship might possibly join an eastbound Atlantic convoy on the way to Europe.  | 
      ||
Under this system of patrolled anchorages, broken voyages, short convoys through endangered areas, and independent daylight sailings along shipping routes patrolled by surface craft and covered by airplanes, as increasingly strong system of protection was built up for the merchant shipping along our coast. But all these measures of defense were supplementary to the convoy system from Hampton Roads to Key West, which, as Cominch had directed on April 3rd, should begin on May 15th. Two days before the end of this month, on April 29th, Commander Eastern Sea Frontier presented Cominch with a set of proposals governing the operation of this convoy system.  | 
      ||
|   
  | 
      ||
        Five 
          escort groups were formed from the available strength consisting of 
          nine destroyers, five corvettes, nine PC's, two gunboats and ten trawlers. 
          Eighteen small vessels were set a side as a reserve pool. These vessels 
          drained off most of the existing surface craft in the Frontier. It was 
          the opinion of Commander Eastern Sea Frontier that with the forces available 
          it would be impossible to insure adequate protection for vessels traveling 
          in convoy and also to perform such other tasks as rescue and offensive 
          action against the submarines. He, therefore, recommended that the proposed 
          date for the introduction of the convoy system be delayed until such 
          time as the strength of the Frontier forces had increased to such an 
          extent that adequate protection for ships traveling in convoy could 
          be assured.  | 
      ||
| In the interim, he proposed, that ample protection for shipping in the Frontier could be obtained by extending the principle of daylight sailing | ||
- 6 -  | 
      ||
|   and ship convoys around dangerous areas to the waters south of Hampton Roads.  | 
      ||
Specifically it was suggested that ships leaving from the Florida Straits should go up the coast as far as Jacksonville or Fernandina where they would lie over for the night. On the following day they would proceed to Charleston, on the day after to Cape Fear and on the day following that to Hatteras. Most of these voyages would be taken independently during daylight, but in particularly dangerous areas short convoys could be instituted.  | 
      ||
|   
  | 
      ||
        This 
          recommendation was in reality, another attempt to solve the familiar 
          problem: How to make the best use possible of the limited forces available. 
          The difficulties of instituting the convoy system before sufficient 
          escort vessels were on hand lay in the fact that inadequately protected 
          convoys presented large, attractive and ill-defended targets. To obviate 
          this CESF at the end of April recommended the delay in the introduction 
          of the convoy system until such time as our increased strength could 
          give us the assurance of protection for our convoyed vessels. The security 
          provided by his proposal to extend the defense system south of Hatteras 
          was admittedly less than that which could be obtained from an adequately 
          escorted convoy, but by the same token the dangers inherent in the broken 
          daylight voyages and the protected anchorages were far less than those 
          to be expected in an inadequately protected convoy.  | 
      ||
- 7 -  | 
      ||